A low concentration of argon also had
significant implications when it came to reconstructing the early
Martian atmosphere. The two common isotopes of argon are argon-36
and argon-40. The former is an inert element produced in the
interior of stars such as our sun, and the latter is created
during the radioactive decay of potassium-40. Both isotopes have
been released over time from the rocks of planets, and it is
generally held that the relative amount of the two says something
about how the atmosphere evolved. For Mars, this theory poses some
interesting problems and questions. Toby Owen proposed the
following scenario during a 28 July 1976 Viking science symposium
at JPL. Using the Earth's atmospheric history as a guide, Owen
argued that one could by analogy plot the evolution of the Martian
atmosphere hack over time. One way to make this analysis for the
two planets was to use argon-36 as the common piece of
information. It was [378] assumed that Earth and Mars were
formed at the same time and from the same inventory of gases in
the solar nebula. If that is true, then Earth and Mars should have
about the same ratio of argon-36 and argon-40 in their
atmospheres. They do not. Earth is relatively poor in argon-36; it
is held that this gas was lost early in the evolution of the
terrestrial atmosphere. Scientists thought that they could deduce
from the amount of argon-36 in the Martian atmosphere the gases
that have been lost. Viking measurements indicate that the planet
should have lost 10 times the amount of carbon dioxide and
nitrogen now measured in the atmosphere. But the loss was not out
into space; it was hidden in some form on the planet itself. Ten
times the present amount of carbon dioxide constitutes a
considerable amount of material to hide. Owen reported: "I'm
suggesting that somewhere between land 10 times the present amount
of CO2 is missing on Mars....and some fraction could still
be present in the form of CO2 trapped in the
[polar] caps. The other part of this reconstruction, which is
interesting, is that it implies a couple of tens of meters of
water on the surface which must also be sequestered somewhere."
30 The water could have become permafrost, but this
explanation disagrees with the theory that the water left the
planet in the form of ionized hydrogen and oxygen.
Although no general agreements have been
reached on how the upper atmosphere of Mars was formed, one point
seems certain: that atmosphere was significantly different in the
past. Just as the evolution of Earth's atmosphere helped determine
the nature of its environment, the evolution of Mars is linked
with the development of its atmosphere. As Jerry Soffen concluded:
"It appears that there was a considerably denser atmosphere in the
past, somewhere between 10 and 50 times the present value of 7.5
millibars at the surface. This denser atmosphere would account for
the possibility of the ancient river [beds] seen from the
orbiter." 31 Whatever explanation the scientific community comes
to accept, Viking has made two points very clear-the Red Planet's
environment has not been static, and in the past was very
dynamic.